The advent of a post-COVID 19
world is an inevitability all of us should start dealing with. The management
of the crises through the pandemic is a public affairs management project whose
outcome will redefine life and its attendant faculties into posterity. The
speed and reach of the virus to global destinations, its rapid human to human
infection, and how it has made it difficult for international collaboration on
its vaccination, makes it an unprecedented virus of seismic global proportions.
As the COVID-19 wreaks havoc to national economies, the social fabric and
creating worldwide fear and uncertainty, it is at the same time establishing a
new order and disrupting global public health governance, and thus public
affairs, as we know or knew them. Countries are experiencing convulsions out of
which both a desire and compulsion for something new is an inevitability. The
containment of humanity into its most basic domicile, home, in order to disrupt
patterns that spread COVID-19, is in itself also an interruption. As the social balance of power gets tilted by
efforts to save humanity from the pandemic, the most consequential outcome of
these efforts, will be a new world being born around us. The attendant public
affairs dynamics will be consequential to almost all aspects of human
governance.
As this new world is being
born around us, it also means there is a world or order that will have to
either come to an end or adapt to the emergent post-COVID-19 conditions. Although
the existing global order is getting bitterly divided on how responses to the
pandemic will impact on the geopolitical power dynamics, there is an emerging
consensus that post-COVID-19 reconstruction with spawn new global financing and
governance architectures. Within states, this will recalibrate elite sectors,
most notably the political economy directing elite. In countries like South
Africa with a well-documented evidence of the inequality gap between the rich
and the poor, the pandemic raffled policy failure feathers as government was
grappling with socio-economic realities that would propel COVID-19 spread.
As the pandemic spreads and
generate various responses with social lockdowns being the most prudent of available
public health solutions, institutions that have been holding and leading
societies may fail to adapt to new conditions. The plummeting demand for goods
and services as a result of client mobility being restricted will collapse some
business models and new ones will have to rise. Society will have new and
faltering wills with growing and difficult to mitigate ambitions and pessimisms.
Since this new world is birthed out of crises, the timing of responses by
humanity as both victim and survivor would procure the best of its resilient
thinkers and actors. There will be little to no time for prolonged responses to
what the crisis would have done to the old world but a demand for thinking that recognizes,
and very fast, that the pre-COVID-19 world is never coming back and efforts to
resurrect it will be in vain.
As governments curtail
economic activity for public health causes, the debate on the extent to which
state intervention should regulate economic activity may signal a resurgence of
central planning, mainly because of its apparent success in the Chinese chapter
of the pandemic. The incumbency of the pandemic as responses are meted will not
only choke thinking about the long term implications of policy responses, but
will also create a rapid coalescence of consensuses based on the public health
exigencies. The determinants of health as codified by the World Health
Organisation will during this period be foregrounded at the expense of the
profit motive that had engulfed health care. The pandemic has actually stirred
most of the determinants to a level where the political economy of health may
be firmly ringfenced more into the political than in health care.
Like human birth, the new
world will come through the most excruciating of pains, it will disrupt the
routine of those that are giving birth, it will demand both maternity and
paternity leaves whilst expecting the new born to be fed and catered for, it will
reduce the buying power of the recipient household, and it will recalibrate the
existing socials and establish new power hierarchies. In order to move on with the
new world, we should first accept it is here. In accepting its arrival we
should equally not accept the inevitable chaos and calamity that will precede
its settling simply because COVID-19 repercussions are irreversible. The new
world will have to be built using the ashes of what may have been burnt by or our
responses or otherwise to COVID-19. The planning of our responses should be
premised on the truism that convulsions tend to have in hibernation ingredients
of what we would need to establish lasting templates to survive the post
reconstruction phase. In fact out of wreckages, new renewables requiring lesser
of our resources and energy always emerge.
As COVID-19 unfolds itself
further and disintegrates societies, as sense of disquiet about the future of
humanity by the established individual-community-society-nation complex and its
supporting institutional forms, the State and Government, will begin to colour
all optimism characteristic of advanced civilizations. The worry and hesitancy
of people which has already manifested itself in forms of panic buying, panic
decision making and a somewhat growing
disbelief in the capacity of those in authority to contain the virus, will be
defining to what the current society becomes beyond pandemic. Premonitions of
an empty earth, with some calling it an apocalypse, have started to make rounds
on pulpits of faith-based organizations, and many a religious discourse. In
conditions such as the one COVID-19 has created, society behaves as though
their way of life is or might be dying. These notions are mostly etched on the
disposable character of humans as a result of death, rather than the continuum
character of humanity as a firmament within which humans operate.
It is indisputable that the
impact of COVID-19 is unprecedented. Given that the unprecedented confounds
understanding, it is expected that all societal lenses will, and as a default,
illuminate the familiar which generally obscures the reality we are facing,
thus turning the unprecedented into and extension of a threatened past instead
of a promise of the future. Responses will in this context, and if we are not careful,
be about normalization of the abnormal, which might make the fighting of
COVID-19 including post-pandemic reconstruction tasks an uphill battle. Because
every vaccine begins in careful knowledge of the enemy disease, the logic of
vaccine development has in the process become a liability to society. The time
frames required to ethically come with a vaccine all point to the reality of a
global recession and thus constraining to the requisite resources for
reconstruction. Containment measures will last for as long as the
socio-economic determinants of health in South Africa are responding to the
pandemic spread curve levelling inputs of government. Countries that will be
first to get out of the ‘containment pit’ will attract investment and other
international economic stimulus instruments. The response and impact of the
pandemic on society will thus be vast and diverse.
Convulsive as it is, COVID-19
has now assumed a status similar to a major innovation, and will thus result in
established societal standards, norms and practices shifting to become new
frontiers of contestation; interests speaking. The disruptions in society that will
come with the pandemic, might result in command structures that came with
interrupted hierarchies being treated not only with disdain but with a
deliberate intent to usher in the new, or claim space for would be incumbents.
The sheer number, and potentially that of the cognitive elite class, of people
that would have died at the hands of COVID-19 will result in the need to reconstruct
large systems not to be dependent on humans as the sole active agents to make
the system work. As the dictates of power in how we organize social
institutions dissipate with the dying, the efficiency of non-human systems will
be on the rise. Our world of work which
we were dependent upon would have thus changed beyond COVID-19. We will be
refugees in an economy that no longer require our skills in their current form.
Unlearning what defines us, and relearning in order to define us anew will be a
new learning pathway. As individuals we will be more the new product to sell
and less the customer to buy. We will be on skill retail shelves with ‘best
before’ and ‘dispose by’ dates; and fear of getting off the shelves will
characterize work and thus recalibrate the established social decorum.
A lot of people will be
disposable in their chosen career paths. Teachers will be rationalized by
online teaching as unemployed parents reclaim their otherwise obligatory
responsibility of inculcating social values, and leaving the school system to
technical content matters. The era of the virtual teacher would have been
consolidated within the cognitive elite in society and the poor will be in a
new race to the top of the otherwise bottom. The service industry will be
constrained by renewed fears of international travel, borderless competitors
who can reach their traditional clients without having to be physically there,
even Pastors will reach their congregations on the basis on what makes sense to
the individual at a time of spiritual hunger. Online retailing will emerge as
the proven form of safe purchasing goods as a sequel of continued fear for
airborne viruses that would have mutated out of the current pandemic. In the
vortex of this generated fear, confusion, and death, surviving persons will be
absorbed into the (health) safe economy.
Containment measures will
reincarnate the traditional family. As the traditional family unit is
reincarnated, the established social will be shrinking. The traffic of physical
contactless human interaction will redefine new basic human rights. At the
level of water and shelter as a human right will be new entrants such as data
access, cloud space ownership and security, uninterrupted energy to facilitate
connectivity, and cyberspace citizen rights. Government as we know it will be
more about the surveillance of citizens than service delivery. A new public
will be defined in order to redefine what is public service and who are public
servants. To illustrate this, our identities, as we will experience when we
will be given barcoded identities that we were tested negative for COVID-19,
will be more the barcode than the cards we hold. These barcodes will make us
citizens in all the spaces we will be allowed as such. Our health report will
give us access to public amenities designated according to a safety criteria
coded into scanners. Our economic health will gentrify us into defined class
groups, and as we improve our data becomes the commodity. International travel
will be managed within algorithms whose ethics are determined by those writing
them.
Public policy will more and
more be about monitoring algorithms that create conflict in society. The
definition of conflicts to be mediated will have as a base the interests that
need to be managed and protected. Our diversity as a keynote of social
condition and opinion will be coded. The th!nc Foundation, a
not-for-profit Public Policy Research, Analysis and Engagement Organization
based in Tshwane, Republic of South Africa, is ideationalizing on several
aspects of the post-COVID 19 reconstruction issues in Public Affairs. In this
working paper, The th!nc Foundation interrogates at a high level a number of
issues relating to the changing world around us. We will ask questions that
will be instructional to the various opinion papers and roundtable discussions
which will be organized as part of our inputs to post-COVID 19 reconstruction
of South Africa. In tandem with the faculty structures of The th!nc
Foundation our focus will be on the following Public Affairs issues; Fragility of Constitutional Rights; Civic Myths of the Nation State; Back to Basics Public Administration; Intergovernmental Relations; Post COVID-19 Reconstruction; Heritage Impacts
FM Lucky Mathebula
The th!nc Foundation Team
April 3, 2020 at 3:23 AM
ReplyDeleteInsightful policy agenda for post-COVID 19 world and the shaping of a new order.
On the global scale, I see:
- a shift in focus from overly economic and financial to global health security;
- re-evaluation of global supply chains especially concentration in China;
- economic nationalization of production of health commodities;
- global interconnectedness and the importance of global public goods; and
- increased cooperation on global public goods namely health, environment
The world post COVID-19
ReplyDeleteIt is more frightening than alarming that the globe was caught napping by COVID-19. I believe it was a shock syndrome that will catapult the world to a new era of drafting and realigning global strategies from a communal perspective. Whilst many may see the disruption emanating from COVID -19 as destructive, to some it is more a transformational process necessitating a new world order.
Lovelock (2018), through his lens of the GAIA hypothesis state that: we are so tied to the Earth that its chills and fever are our chills and fevers also. He sees the Earth as a superorganism that forms a synergistic, self -regulating and complex system that helps maintain and perpetuates the evolving condition of life. COVID-19 may thus be regarded as a stimulus to a fundamental change in the natural environment and world countries as organisms in that environment.
The emergence from COVID-19 will require a war like strategy dealing with challenges of new demands, innovation and changing consumer patterns and record-breaking fiscal stimulus. COVID-19 has the potential to cause disruptive pressure on the geopolitics resulting in a changed world order causing a shift in the global power balance. In hindsight, as stated by Barnhardt and Kroukamp (2020), it may also produce a low road where international institutions are undermined and countries become isolationists, protectionists, populists and nationalists.
The questions are: how will the world order change, what will become of our global economy and in what form will our global economy emerge? Will we see new barriers or new innovative approaches to global trade?
Ronald Reagan in this address to The United Nations in 1987 said: “I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide will vanish if we were facing an alien from outside this world.”
COVID -19 is a common enemy to all of us the world over and I believe has the ability to unite nations of the world in an integrated whole, where traditional esoteric clandestine manipulations will be history. It will force us to rethink our priorities and preserve the planet against man made abuse and misuse.
Mahabir (2020) sees it as an essential intervention in reawakening a culture of compassion, kindness and unity of purpose which came not just to sanitize the way we live today, but also bring sanity in the way that we plan in unison.
Call it the necessary evil if you will, albeit with astronomical costs.
The world post COVID-19
DeleteIt is more frightening than alarming that the globe was caught napping by COVID-19. I believe it was a shock syndrome that will catapult the world to a new era of drafting and realigning global strategies from a communal perspective. Whilst many may see the disruption emanating from COVID -19 as destructive, to some it is more a transformational process necessitating a new world order.
Lovelock (2018), through his lens of the GAIA hypothesis state that: we are so tied to the Earth that its chills and fever are our chills and fevers also. He sees the Earth as a superorganism that forms a synergistic, self -regulating and complex system that helps maintain and perpetuates the evolving condition of life. COVID-19 may thus be regarded as a stimulus to a fundamental change in the natural environment and world countries as organisms in that environment.
The emergence from COVID-19 will require a war like strategy dealing with challenges of new demands, innovation and changing consumer patterns and record-breaking fiscal stimulus. COVID-19 has the potential to cause disruptive pressure on the geopolitics resulting in a changed world order causing a shift in the global power balance. In hindsight, as stated by Barnhardt and Kroukamp (2020), it may also produce a low road where international institutions are undermined and countries become isolationists, protectionists, populists and nationalists.
The questions are: how will the world order change, what will become of our global economy and in what form will our global economy emerge? Will we see new barriers or new innovative approaches to global trade?
Ronald Reagan in this address to The United Nations in 1987 said: “I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide will vanish if we were facing an alien from outside this world.”
COVID -19 is a common enemy to all of us the world over and I believe has the ability to unite nations of the world in an integrated whole, where traditional esoteric clandestine manipulations will be history. It will force us to rethink our priorities and preserve the planet against man made abuse and misuse.
Mahabir (2020) sees it as an essential intervention in reawakening a culture of compassion, kindness and unity of purpose which came not just to sanitize the way we live today, but also bring sanity in the way that we plan in unison.
Call it the necessary evil if you will, albeit with astronomical costs.
We are certainly living in a new world with new rules. Thanks to Covid-19. Hopefully we will take advantage of these new rules
ReplyDeleteWe are definitely entering a new world, all we've come to know is changing and requires that we change every aspect of our lives, from social interactions, our professional and work responsibilities and even the economics and politics of government and governance. My only fear is that the focus is largely on the now, how to come out of this (rightfully so) and carry on, but it's the carrying on that we aren't really thinking about and this article clearly articulates just that. We all need to start thinking about what we need to do to bounce back.
ReplyDelete