South Africa has arrived at a stage where its politics are shaping into two dominant orientations, with rats and mice falling between the uncovered spaces. Two nodes are developing, albeit with ideological overlaps, the intersection of which is an area the economic establishment wishes could be occupied by a pliant minority party with its interests as the context of all political contexts in South Africa. Having succeeded in influencing the Constitution as a broadly interpretable supreme law of the country and ensuring the foundational interpretations are settled in the apex court, what is still outstanding is the control of the executive authority of the Republic.
Opposition
politics has been about managing the impact of RSA's past injustices on how the
future turns out to be for those who benefited. A new breed of opposition focuses
on the governing party's lenience in dealing with the injustice of the past. The
common objective of anti-corruption and state capture created the truly
non-racial opposition space. Whereas these look to be in sequence, they are
scaffolds of one opposition narrative and complex. Service delivery and the macroeconomic
environment featured mostly in party manifestos, but could not mainstream these
as the core context.
The
lived experience of the majority of voters, which had the consequence of
anything or anyone supported by the economic establishment, in particular the
white one, represents what cannot be agreed with. Anyone who demonstrates an
appetite to fracture templates of dominance better than the governing party
stands a chance of being allowed to govern. This context is so strong that
non-qualifying candidates become heroes, notwithstanding their being at
variance with the rule of law as the overarching founding value of RSA.
How
voters are approached during election time has become a science that political
parties must master. The psychology and context of a majority excluded from the
main political economy theatre dominate this science's elements. Some political
party leaders have a sociological resonance with the established authority
systems in many households. For. Instance, the conduct of leaders like Zuma is
not uncommon; in some quarters, he is a fraction of the worst and better many aspire
to become.
The
uBaba designation is sociologically deeper than meets the eye. The eldership
system that resuscitated the ANC election after it pulled out of retirement and
the other 'uBabas', Ntates, and Tatas is also more profound. The depth of
impact of supporting anything or anyone that rebels has had such an impact that
reconstruction or construction of the future is perpetually dependent on
understanding first what to deconstruct. A thesis of what is to be is
incomplete unless an antithesis is given airtime. Leaders know more about what
it can't be than what it should be.
It
is the mastery of this psychology that will come with a breakthrough. With all
the contextual discontents defining Rwanda, the current leadership, which
operates with a thesis of what they want to be, is the new magic driving
development in that country. The attitude of focusing on where society wants to
be; defines several competitive nations. Those who continue to win elections are
good at problematising the past without dealing with the present. Until the future
is seen differently, the past will define voter behaviour and attitude. CUT!!!
Comments
Post a Comment