This was in the BusinessDay of 04 June 2024: Minority government would allow ANC to govern without a coalition.
The journey towards the thriving of a normative majority rule and the subversion of a prerogative tyranny of the majority took thirty years. Notwithstanding the animating force majority rule had sometimes used to block ethical and accountability demands of society, it could not stop the fitful march of proportional representation. The less than 50% performance by all political parties has been lying low as a counter-animating force to secure the triumph of accountability when the numbers start to dictate political sanity and humility, crucial elements for a healthy and functional democracy.
The
preamble of the Constitution, adopted by freely elected representatives to
ensure it becomes the supreme law under which any order can thrive, provides
for legislative, executive, and judicial authorities that vest in Parliament,
the President, and the Courts. Since its inception, the reception tradition
within which the Constitution had to evolve was one of a single-party dominated
multiparty system. Despite the safeguards the Constitution had to manage the
animating force of the majority parties in all spheres of government, the risks
and temptations of one-partyism created a context where the National Executive
got into a duality of normative and prerogative decision-making. Unless
challenged, unconstitutionality settled as a sub-context in governing.
The
2024 election results have led to a hung parliament, which demands
immediate attention. There is no constitutional provision to manage this
impasse. The transition to form a government will largely be according to the
preferences of political parties, the investment environment influencing
agencies, and benchmarking from similar democracies and circumstances. While
there are options South Africa can look to, the emerging scenario is a
preoccupation with one option. The dominant discourse is about a coalition
government, to the exclusion of paths like a minority government, which could
be a viable and beneficial alternative.
The
minority government, a potential alternative, could bring about significant
benefits. It would allow the majority party to form a government, eliminating
the need to choose a coalition partner. This would elevate the centrality of
consensus or issue-specific lobbying and coalescing as and when required. A
legislature of national unity could become a mechanism to enforce public
accountability. Presiding officers of Parliament could be from parties other
than the majority party, fostering a sense of inclusivity and shared responsibility.
Except
for accountability, a minority government option will establish a context where
the President understands the limits of their mandate. S/he will be the
President of South Africa and will be expected to act the same. The National
Assembly can consider allowing the President to look beyond the NA when
constituting the Cabinet. The threshold of two persons can be stretched to not
more than ten. That way, the accountability ecosystem will integrate the much
brandied about meritocracy into government. Ministers can be recruited from
capable, underutilised South Africans anchored on the mandate of all
representatives of the people in Parliament. Given the already displayed
reliance on evidence and logic which Ramaphosa has thus far displayed, albeit
at the cost of rapid decisiveness, he will be released from the dogmatic
dictates of one political party and be chained to what the Constitution and our
national interests expect of an RSA president. The 2024 election outcome might
be an opportunity to confirm our seriousness that South Africa is too big to
fall.
The alternative of
entering into a coalition might lurch South Africa into a less appreciated
chaos in two distinct ways. The fragile ensemble that the ANC ideological
ensemble has become, and Zuma's performance in the 2024 elections is evidence
only hallucinating, and brave people can refute, is in a politically brittle
state to put Ramaphosa in a condition where he must choose a coalition partner.
The first risk to the stability of the democratic order is to insist he gets
into a coalition with the DA. Irrespective of whatever logic is presented, the
DA represents what is most in the influence centres of the ANC-ideological
complex, current and past members.
A coalition with the DA
will create perfect conditions for the murmurings to convene a National General
Council or Special Conference of the ANC to consider the ‘what is to be done
question’. Legitimate or otherwise, the conference might be, insisting on a
DA/ANC coalition, even if it is an investment environment creating an
environment, will not fly given the truth of a 64% ANC-ideological complex Parliamentary
majority required to settle matters arising from the CODESA arrangement. The
existence of tensions between the ANC, MK, and EFF should not be read to be differences
on how to deal with fundamental existential policy positions of the ANC as a
liberation movement. The fragility of the ANC as a centre which holds the
stability of the democratic order cannot be stretched beyond what the 40%
outcome has done.
Equally, a coalition
with MK and EFF will create perfect conditions to unleash an otherwise prepared
cocktail of measures to neutralise the moral prowess of the ANC over any
condition of apartheid or racism in general. The ability of the ANC to
coordinate the Global South, Russia, and China for several causes, with the
Palestinian genocide as a near-memory geopolitical matter, requires a sober
analysis of how the RSA state and the institutional power it embodies should be
managed through the lows and ebbs facing the democratic order. The
geostrategic, constitutional order defending and consolidating the post-1994
gains the ANC has made loosely arranged partnerships working on an
issue-by-issue basis that a minority government option can deal with.
The 2024 election
outcomes are an echo whose voice lies inside the ANC, EFF, MK, and the smaller
parties articulating the fundamentals which inspired colonial struggles. Thabo Mbeki's
calls for a National Dialogue, potentially late or contaminated by the
relations between the convening node and critical figures in the
ANC-ideological complex, might be an intervention through which points of
convergence could be established as a Minority Government threads the required
stability. The secret of the post-May 29 context is that the election results
are a truth waiting in plain sight yet buried by political economy defending
hindrances and status quo traditionalisms.
In the profound words of the IEC Chief Electoral Officer of the RSA, “(our) democracy has spoken. Indeed, the people have expressed their political choices through the ballot box. We now must honour the voter's choice, for an election is essentially an enquiry on the political choices of the moment. In an election, the choice of the voter is sovereign”. Lest we subvert, we might lurch our order into chaos. Mr President of the ANC, there is no need for a coalition; negotiate differently.
Dr Mathebula is a public
policy analyst, founder of The Thinc Foundation, and a Research Associate at
Tshwane University of Technology.
ANC/EFF/MK coalition can bring together thieves who would steal till kingdom come. It would unleash untold suffering of the Black masses.
ReplyDelete