As we describe the nature of political opposition developing around, within, and out of us, we should appreciate that our character as an organisation will have to change as an outcome of the renewal journey we have embarked upon. A decision to renew an organisation is complete if it runs towards its criticism. The truth that comes from criticism should be confronted head-on.
Renewal is not just a
theoretical concept; it's a practical call to action. It requires a complete
reorientation of our organization towards its core values and objectives. For
the ANC, this means more than just implementing policies; it means living and
breathing the very essence of the South African Constitution in our daily
actions and decisions.
As a liberation movement
and political party, it is threatened by factionalism, the multiple oncoming
sub-national elections before 16 December 2027, sophisticated ethnic divisions,
the national question, a grossly underperforming and unequalised economy,
corruption, poverty, unemployment, inequality, and numerous other challenges.
The milestones of and about the renewal will manifest in the quality and
calibre of regional and provincial executive committees that will be elected to
feed into the 2027 National Elective Conference. It will be other filtering criteria
beyond qualifications and mandatory programs from the OR Tambo School that will
make the difference.
Our path to renewal is a
paradox, as we must look both backwards and forwards. Our history and
tradition, the very fabric of the ANC, are not to be discarded but to be
learned from. Honest introspection is our guide, leading us to new paths of
renewal for the movement. Our elected representatives, the movement's most
visible faces, and appointed officials in organs of state play a crucial role
in this. They must embark on a path of personal and national renewal. The
strength of the ANC's history and tradition, and its ability to address its
mistakes and flaws, lies in how its leadership, as individuals, represent the
ANC through their conduct.
The success of our
national renewal is contingent on the unwavering commitment of ANC leaders at
all levels. It's not enough to simply affirm a civic covenant; we must make the
founding values of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the obligations
imposed by the Constitution's preamble absolute and universal. This
responsibility extends to all, including those who are victims of the sins of
their forefathers. As we strive to realize the ideals of the Constitution, we
must ensure that no one is left behind.
The crisis of legitimacy
manufactured out of the Zondo Commission report and many other investigations
reports are minuscule compared to the social, cultural, and economic genocide
unleashed on the majority of South Africans for the past three centuries. The
impact of structural exclusion concerning human competence is still a function
of the low, competitive character of the economy, save for the supply of hewers
of mineral resources.
For almost a century,
the ANC's power and influence stemmed from tangible liberatory policies that
its followers saw, measured, and generally controlled. Society, particularly
youth, could be conscripted to its ideals of a better life for all. For the
better part of this period, almost 70% of it has been illegal, hunted, and
declared part of the axis of terror by association. In its current state, it
commands not only its legality as an intangible source of power but also the
legitimate authority to govern as the party with the majority of votes despite
it not being absolute power.
With command of 70% of
South Africa's executive authority, a new, post-2024 opposition complex not
hostile to its foundational policy prescripts, and corruption and malfeasance
blame fatigued leadership; it has passed the point of failure in its renewal
journey.
The unfolding GNU power
sharing, by coalition consensus, and the arrangements to govern South Africa provide
a short window to change the balance of forces that have been liquidating
renewal efforts. The ANC must now lead from the centre of a network instead of
being on top of a hierarchical pyramid of absolute power. Those at the edges of
the power, by choice of wanting to be a new opposition complex, should be
allowed in by taking on board their otherwise ANC-birthed perspectives, albeit
radicalised. The extra time it takes to run an idea by others or ensure that
the right people, including your adversaries, are in the loop is what the ANC
has historically known to be time spent weaving a web of inclusion and
accountability to its ideas. This is how it built the largest coalition against
apartheid, with the reward of it now being classified as a global crime against
humanity. With similar finesse, its renewal program can be anchored on economic
imperialism and its adjuncts as a form of crime against humanity.
To create a new brigade
anchored on its renewal program, the ANC should recreate a central ideational
and institutional power structure within itself to undermine the
split-authority structure of its ideological leverage. On the other hand, the
GNU must be seen as the strategic push for a more pluralistic South Africa, one
in which more diverse organisations and voices drive policy and change, must
come from citizens, "we the people", themselves. It is "the
reciprocal ties of being or building a nation. However, we define it, and
community, wherever we find it, which is as fundamental an element of the South
African character as individual striving". Nelson Mandela sums it up thus:
"It is in y(our) hands."
Renewal is, therefore,
in the ANC's hands to the extent that it wins the more minor battles that ate
away its support. The chirping sounds of discontent amongst its members about
the inconsistent application of its member integrity management systems is the
lowest hanging yet complex to plug out fruit. With the executive authority it
commands, more minor battles include changing the electoral system to a fully constituency-based
system where valid majority rule can reign.
As members of the ANC,
we know that our organisational systems are broken. We know branches are far
from being functional that we can boldly call the basic units of the
organisation. We know the criminal element has captured our branches, and some
of them have turned into sophisticated vigilante groups which are responsible
for the growing voter boycott of the system. Yet, to remove any of these
obstacles requires renewal policies or resolutions that cannot pass precisely
because our system is broken. CUT!!
Comments
Post a Comment