The edited version was published in the Sunday Times on 17th November 2024
The South African
coalition government experiment at the national level is facing challenges that
might induce its disintegration. The limited time the legislative framework
allows for a government to be formed needs to be extended to give more time for coalition
agreements to be pragmatically negotiated. The established precedent is that it
takes almost 100 days to emerge with a sustainable coalition. Because political
party manifestos are set policy positions and should ordinarily be the basis of
any coalition agreement, sufficient time to strike genuine compromises is
required.
The less than 50%
performance in the 2024 elections forced a coalition government arrangement. This
gave the ANC a political lifeline. With no clear mandate on who to coalesce with,
a hostile relationship between the ANC and the MK Party-EFF complex, and the
need to stabilise the fragile democratic order, avoiding further hurt to the
reputation of the ANC as leader of society, a coalition with a 'market-friendly'
DA-led opposition complex became inevitable.
Under normal
circumstances, the coalition negotiations should have processed the vexing
matters of foreign policy, what is in the national interest, national security,
economic policy and international trade relations, cooperative governance and
local government reform, energy security policies, and the national question.
Instead, the RSA Constitution was invoked as a neutral platform to coalesce
with, albeit with a hush-toned 60% outright sufficient consensus-driven
process. Whatever the ANC and DA agree, the rest are in a tag-along coalition
relationship.
In policy terms, the
coalition arrangement amounted to a profoundly pro-markets moment and a
reassuring investor-friendly environment. It represents marginal wins to the
main coalescing parties, the ANC and DA. The transfer of economic and social
control power, a still-to-be-resolved component of the ANC's national
democratic revolution (NDR), has been more or less left on the wayside. The GNU
coalition has blurred the ideological difference between the ANC-led left-of-the-centre
and the DA-led right-of-the-centre politics, yet accentuating the centre as a
consequential safe space to craft a new 'democratic alliance' in a conceptual
sense.
Unless truly apathetic,
the eligible but not voting voters, who are numerically more than those who
voted, plus the politically homeless liberal centre voters that fluctuate
between the ANC and DA, the consequence of the GNU coalition might already be a
conceptually true democratic alliance breed. Since the 1994 democratic
breakthrough, the influence of the global liberal order within the South
African political and ideological space has come to rival ideological
orientations that gained traction with the majority of “we the people” simply
because the liberal order flirted with the apartheid ideology.
Despite the undeniable contribution of countries that were on the east side of the Cold War, there have always been some in the ANC-led liberation movement who questioned whether the influence of leftist ideological positions is a uniformly good proposition for a post-apartheid South Africa. Yet even those who raised such questions typically ascribed the problems of leftist economic policies to the application challenges. With a near memory of ‘swaart and rooi gevaar’ post the 1994 democratic breakthrough, the nature of leftist economic thought was rarely questioned; instead, its vocabulary would be craftily used to justify mandate drifts and shifts towards neoliberal choices.
The ideological rifts
within the ANC and the appeal of the MK Party-EFF node as a potential
alternative force of the left and the almost ripe-to-disengage component of the
SACP might erode the leftist’s support within the ANC. The intense
fragmentation of political allegiances of Black voters, and Africans in
particular, with identity, class, and erroneous interpretations of left and
right politics, creates an opportunity for a new political centre to emerge
alongside the many fragments. The relative calm in Parliament, the growing
respect of society as political mandate determiners, and general fatigue about
anti-system rebellious rhetoric bode well for a society yearning for a
democratic order that prioritises their well-being as the basis of
politics.
While the ANC-DA
anchored GNU will increasingly become politically fragile unless the economic
fortunes of the country start demonstrating its necessity where it matters, the
political context will continue fragmenting, and further coalition arrangements
which will weaken the centre of the state will be the order of the day. Indeed,
Capital and civil society movements will be winners in an emerging ideology-fluid
state. Political parties, especially if the ANC continues on its disintegration
and fragmentation path, will be reduced to in-Parliament voting stakes holding
entities brought together by political party funding interests and less
"we the people" interests.
With the absolute majority governing party state reality in a perfectly declining mode, creating a stable democratic order will increasingly be about building coalitions of uniquely South African polities or communities, each having a crucial role. Ultimately, the arrangements to govern each other that are eventually adopted must benefit "we the people". It must ultimately be about the respect, promotion, protection, and fulfilment of the rights in the Bill of Rights enshrined in our Constitution.
The brute and somewhat
inconvenient truth is that many of South Africa’s victories as a nation have
come through its ability to build coalitions around its challenges. What might
be lagging is South Africa’s acceptance of the unquestioned axiom of political
thought that power in society is distributed unequally. Those with power or
proximity to power as components of the elite in society are internally
homogeneous, unified, and conscious. The rise of elite autonomy, which is
choked by a grossly underperforming economy and a capability-challenged state,
is leading the calibration of a ‘democratic alliance’ without merging political
parties. CUT!
Comments
Post a Comment