THE ROLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN SOCIO-ECONOMIC GROWTH. (A keynote address at the Conference of The South African Private Higher Education 06/11/2024)
“Higher Education is not the
birthplace of poets or immortal authors, founders of schools, leaders of
countries or conquerors of nations. Its purpose is not limited to
training professional men, though this falls within its scope. A
university education should instead give humanity a clear conscious view of his
own opinions and judgements, a truth in developing them, an eloquence in
expressing them and a force in urging them,” and let me add, redefine if not
advance humanity’s civilisation.
The unique challenges of
higher education in Africa, particularly in South Africa, have compelled me to
approach the subject of higher education in the context of this conference with
a critical lens. My PhD mentor's question, 'Do you think your mother, who only
completed grade 10 in 1958, would understand your work?' reminds me of the need for clarity and accessibility in academic discourse.
From this wisdom, I
learned never to assume conceptual consensus on any subject and, by default, to
define what I mean with a concept I should address. I am asked to deal with THE
ROLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN SOCIOECONOMIC GROWTH.
The dictionary defines
higher education as “education beyond high school, expressly provided by
colleges, graduate schools, and professional schools”.
In RSA Law, “higher
education” means all learning programs leading to qualifications higher than
grade 12 or its equivalent in terms of the National Qualifications Framework as
contemplated in the South African Qualifications Authority Act, 1995 (Act No.
58 of 1995) and includes tertiary education as contemplated in Schedule 4 of
the Constitution; and schedule four (4) unambiguously excludes tertiary
education as a functional area of concurrent and provincial competence; it is a
strictly national function.
Higher education
institutions in South Africa are crucial in offering vocational and
research-oriented study programmes. These institutions, whether public or
private, are instrumental in equipping students with the practical skills
necessary for the evolving job market. It is important to note that the
dispensation may have hybrids like the Model C schools, which I
believe are present but potentially not explicitly articulated in those
terms.
The NQF, which identifies ten
levels divided into three bands, makes it easier to delineate which higher
education I will refer to.
a. Levels 1-4 equate to high
school grades 9 to 12, including vocational training
b. Levels 5 to 7 are college
diplomas and technical qualifications
c. Levels 7 to 10 are
university degrees
This means Higher Education is from Levels 5 to 10. Consequently,
Nancy, my Topic is safely THE ROLE OF (LEVEL 5-10) HIGHER EDUCATION IN
SOCIOECONOMIC GROWTH.
Pursuing truth, knowledge,
critical thinking, and culture in a developing country and economy like
ours is an inarguable necessity. However, more profound issues surrounding
our nation determine the context within which socioeconomic growth can be
guaranteed.
I must hasten to remind us
that many in the higher education sector, either as authors of prescribed
textbooks, set works for literature, and by default culture-defining stories,
faculty, and management have lived through a past in which the interests of
learning were sacrificed, consciously and methodically, to the interests of a tormenting
state-sponsored ideology of separating all for an asymmetrical development of
some at the expense of others.
The then context did not treat
education as a fundamental human and enabling right but as a mechanism of
social control and economic template definition, potentially into posterity;
hence, it isn’t easy to imagine a future within the set templates.
This project was executed
in and by public education institutions. The state and public higher education
institutions colluded about which idea of truth they would all be loyal to.
This is notwithstanding the sparse availability of scholars and thinkers inside
many public higher education institutions who refused to compact with their
intellectual and scholarship suicide.
In South Africa, our
challenge is competence. We are continuously challenged to work on the skills the
economy needs. We must do this through imparting knowledge, as our
development age and standing might be in deficit. The choice has always been
about how we respond to this challenge in a society that is grossly challenged by
the attributes in society and how we match them with our future demands.
Higher education
interventions must focus more on the economy's ‘how-to’ demands and less on ‘what-is’.
I am a recipient of how-to higher education, and I happen to have been at the
most concentrated how-to centre of Black Higher Education in the 1980s. My
first qualification was a Secondary Teachers Diploma; we used to call it M+3. Today,
it is called NQF 7.
In my three years of
training, I was taught how to teach what learners will learn when I complete my
diploma. The rest was about the learner and understanding various sporting
codes, art forms, and other extra-mural activities of interest.
The system had
agricultural colleges and Technikons, which produced civil engineering
practitioners, computer science Diplomandi, medical technicians, construction
engineering Diplomandi, and many other how-to-do trades.
I later went to
university. I realised that unlike colleges and many other non-university NQF
level 7 institutions whose existence is through the graces of the
skills-industrial-practice complex, the University exists instead through the
good graces of the body politic.
As a society, our need for
universities is our appetite for the pure service of truth we believe lies
within its orbit. This is why universities exist better in societies that do
not interfere with their programs and curricula. Universities are expected to
be the intellectual conscience of each era according to the progression demands
of civilisation. To the extent that university faculty bears unlimited
responsibility for the pursuit of truth, it cannot bear the responsibility of
current politics.
The university links
reality more through knowledge than action. At its zenith, it typifies life
away from practical affairs.
To contribute to socioeconomic
growth, higher education should understand higher education institutions'
roles, character and capabilities. As a society, a nation, and a sovereign
state, we are all enjoined by a common desire to,
a. Heal the divisions of the
past and establish a society based on democratic values, social justice and
fundamental human rights.
b. Lay the foundations for a
democratic and open society in which government is based on the people's will
and every citizen is equally protected by law.
c. Improve the quality of
life of all citizens and free the potential of each person; and,
d. Build a united and
democratic South Africa able to take its rightful place as a sovereign state in
the family of nations
To this end, we identify
the following roles of higher education in socio-economic growth: improving
productivity, promoting innovation, alleviating poverty, improving the standard
of living, and reducing inequalities.
Improving Productivity: Higher
education should produce factory-ready alums as far as possible. There must be
a short distance between productivity and the last day at a higher education
institution.
Promoting Innovation. Innovation
in higher education can only be achieved by institutions that foster deep,
integrated learning, synthesis, and analysis in a transdisciplinary manner. The
learning point of departure for such institutions is to accept the inconvenient
truth that today's skills are scaffoldings of tomorrow's unknown skills.
Alleviating Poverty: Improving
standard living: Reducing inequalities.
To underscore its
relevance, higher education must consider what decisions it will permit (the
context of) society to make and then create an auditing process for continuous
evaluation. It must establish guidelines to align innovation with societal
goals and sovereign national interests in a global context. Higher education
institutions, in their various forms, should ask:
a. How does this curricular
or learning path or occurrence add value?
b. What are the learning
tradeoffs with the future?
c. What are the safeguards
for society to avoid finding itself future-irrelevant?
d. How does higher education
align or misalign with ethical foundations or values undergirding society?
e. What role does the state
or legitimate authorities play?
The brute truth is that
humankind will always follow the arc of what it considers progress. In our case
as South Africa, we have learned that the most significant burden of freedom is the
absence of oppression to blame when freedom demands accountability.
Like the Chinese, a nation
that strives to be better is, by default, already superior to one that claims
to be great. In this context, higher education is not only about
being a better society but also about being a more significant institutional locus of
how great our country can be because of the better persons we churn out after
every graduation and in every individual graduate we brand as our alumnus.
One of the scariest
thoughts I have ever had as an alumnus of every institution I have attended is
how proud each of them is of what I have become simply because I roamed in
their environments. That is the ultimate test of education at any level.
Those who work in this sector have limited rights to decry the skills deficit,
lack of knowledge, and questionable human attributes.
There is always a price to
pursue and speak the truth, but living a lie is a higher price. We must always
consider higher education institutions as arenas within which intellectual
justice is displayed publicly through the various disciplines we call modules,
which build up to qualification. I thank you
Dynasties and governments
have come and gone, but educators and students have kept the nation's
fundamental unity and democratic traditions alive. This is what higher education can’t
fail to be. Thank you.
Comments
Post a Comment