The edited version was published in the Sunday Times, 27 April 2025
A simple search about the purpose of tax yields “to fund social and economic programmes, and to provide public goods and services, such as schools, universities, hospitals, clinics and roads, as well as defence and security. " Taxes make the Democratic order sovereign and functional. They represent the income side of the state revenue account. Embedded in the purpose of tax is the question of who has the ultimate authority to decide how to tax society. Our Constitution provides that this authority is derived.
Firstly,
the authority originates from the electoral mandate that our freely elected
representatives receive from "we the people" when we cast our votes.
Consequently, the public representatives serve at our pleasure for a five-year
term and must account for and renew their mandate.
Secondly,
the public representatives elect a State President who holds the executive
authority of the republic. This arrangement means that the President serves at
the pleasure of Parliament. A fifty-plus-one vote from the freely elected
public representatives finalises the arrangement.
Thirdly,
the President exercises executive authority together with Cabinet members. The
Minister of Finance is responsible for developing tax policy and overseeing the accountability of the tax regime. It is assumed that SARS is technically
at the centre of raising and collecting revenue related to tax matters.
With the origin of the
authority clarified, it is essential to note that a primary majority of
fifty-one per cent determines the extent to which the absolute power to govern
can be exercised. In a reality where no party has more than a 50% majority, the
authority to govern is institutionalised to be shared.
This constitutional
facility is a direct result of the liberation struggle demanded by "we the
people" that "no government can justly claim authority unless it is
based on the will of all the people. " If the people's will dictates power
sharing, no arrangement can change democracy's full impact.
In this context, this
rendition celebrates the reversal of the VAT increase. What is scary to imagine
is what would have happened if the tax policy intent to increase VAT to 17% had
found a party with a 50 %+ threshold to govern. The 0,5% compromise came
later as threats of litigation and other mechanisms started to tilt the balance
of forces in favour of reversal. This is a moment when the valid reasons why
the RSA Constitution is hailed as one of the best in the world are as
follows:
This representation
facility of "we the people " has been used, arguably for the first
time since 1910, to question and stop the implementation of the fiscal
framework. It is no longer a given that tax and budget decisions will be
subjected to the technical correctness of the Church Square or, rather, Paul
Kruger Square Consensus in Tshwane. It has now shifted to the town
halls, where we, the people, reign.
Whatever spin doctoring
will be made by political parties on this monumental victory against the
arbitrary power to levy tax, and restore it to the realm of government of, by,
and for the people, the victory to reverse the VAT increase belongs to the May
2024 outcomes.
With all the discontent
the May 2024 outcome carries, it has cracked a veil for "we the
people" to have an enriched relationship with the democratic order we are
so much a part of. What has not happened yet, and should be encouraged to
happen, is to interrogate all similar revenue-raising decisions within the
context of whose authority is being used to set thresholds, such as municipal property ratings, NERSA's electricity tariff determination, and other
regulated pricing regimes.
The retreat on VAT
presents an opportunity for society to express itself and be vocal. This aligns
with what our Constitution signifies when it establishes us as an open society.
Our freely elected public representatives have taken three decades to unite in
our interest. Now that they have, we must demand more from them to reshape the
demographic consequences of budget decisions. The next budget should be
approved only after it has addressed spatial per capita questions.
The out-of-court
settlement sought by the ANC, and supported by the DA, should concern us as a
civil society. The issues raised in the affidavit are of such constitutional
significance that it would have been prudent for the case to continue and
establish case law for future reference. CUT!!
Comments
Post a Comment